-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 591
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
gadget: emmc syntax support #14533
gadget: emmc syntax support #14533
Conversation
fb01951
to
bed97d5
Compare
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #14533 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 78.95% 78.97% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 1084 1085 +1
Lines 146638 147221 +583
==========================================
+ Hits 115773 116272 +499
- Misses 23667 23723 +56
- Partials 7198 7226 +28
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you! I have some questions, mainly about rpmb and some checks.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
just one comment about naming
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks - some minor comments, but already approving
// -*- Mode: Go; indent-tabs-mode: t -*- | ||
|
||
/* | ||
* Copyright (C) Canonical Ltd |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We do not put the year here anymore? Is this a new policy?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
From a legal standponit we don't have to, we should slowly migrate to year-less headers, i wanted to bring this up at the sprint but forgot
…ing the error message just repeating twice. rename the validEMMCNames back again to be consistent
9958871
to
5b10081
Compare
This is the first PR of 3 (likely) in the road to emmc support.
The first PR (this one)
Next PRs:
REF: SNAPDENG-32142